Author Archives: Patty Motley

About Patty Motley

I have spent over 19 years trying to teach people about their rights and how they are ultimately responsible for them. https://www.facebook.com/marlenemotley

What Revolution?

The one that will never come? The one that never came? With all the rights the people of this country have seen disappear there never was a revolution. What would make the people think there ever will be one?

“The Government will never get my guns.”

“The people will fight back if there is a gun confiscation.”

No. The government is already taking your guns and no-one is fighting back.  Some are even helping. Every person who applied for a Concealed Weapons Permit (CWP) has been in league with the government. You have gone to the government and asked “Permission” to exercise a God-given right. And in doing so you have signed a contract giving up that right.  You’ve even given up your 5th Amendment right just by filling out the form. You know, the part that says you don’t have to be a witness against yourself.

Juries everyday find people guilty of crimes involving “illegal guns”, generally meaning they are not permitted to own or carry them. But this is a violation of the rights of the person possessing the gun. So why is it allowed?

It is allowed because the people have been conditioned to accept it. And the conditioning will continue and the people will not revolt. They will find more and more excuses to pass more and more laws and through “law enforcement” pick us off one by one until there are none left. They have no reason to go door to door to take your guns because eventually you will give them up.

”But they won’t get MY gun.”

Look at your child or grandchild. Would you hold on to your gun if the only way to feed or clothe that child was by giving up your gun? Would you get in a gun battle with a government entity who would have custody of that child should your efforts fail? You think the government doesn’t already know the answer to these questions?

Look at what you have given up already…

  • Freedom of speech… From “Free Speech” zones to fear of the “political climate” people are not only afraid to speak their minds but afraid to be associated with anyone who does.
  • Peaceful Assembly…When people are told they must have a “permit” (Permission) to assemble then the right is gone. And anyone who applies for the “permit” has helped to destroy that right.  And anyone who has enforced that “permit” has violated the rights of the person who either refused to apply or the person who was coerced into applying for the permit. (“Papers please.”)
  • Petitioning the Government for Redress of Grievance… Why does no-one do this? The government should be so bogged down in paperwork there should be time for little else. Oh, that’s right, at some point some government employee will say, “You really should get a lawyer.” Now comes all the lovely fees.
  • Unreasonable searches and seizures… “Probable Cause”. Need I say more? The people have been so led to believe that it is OK to “search and/or seize” just because an officer thinks it is OK, especially if “You have nothing to hide.”. Have we really come to the point we think others should have unlimited power over us whether we have anything to hide or not? (If your answer is “Yes” please defriend me on Facebook.)
  • To be confronted with witnesses against you…”Confidential informants” The no-see-ums of Law Enforcement. (This alone should get jurors to judge against LE.) Obtaining witnesses in your favor… Not if a judge thinks it brings no merit to the case for whatever reason a judge decides. Who gave them this power?
  • Assistance of counsel… I bet you thought that meant a “lawyer”, right?  That is what they want you to believe. But “counsel” is anyone who can counsel you on your rights.
  • Right to trial by jury… How many have waved this right and paid a fine because a trial would just be too inconvenient? As long as the “state” makes money and it costs them nothing they will continue to harass.
  • “nor excessive fines”… We are fined for everything and always in excess. The bait and switch is to call it a “fee” and impose it on everything.  And the reasoning is that by going about your daily life you might commit a crime.
  • “nor cruel and unusual punishments”… You go to jail just because an officer doesn’t like your attitude, or worse yet, he doesn’t like you. Maybe you are “known” to LE as someone who doesn’t like them depriving people of their rights, maybe they are told to watch for any opportunity to arrest or harass you. (You think these guys won’t enforce any gun law, constitutional or not?)
  • Rights retained by the people… The 9th Amendment states that if the people wish to retain their rights there is NOTHING contained in the Constitution that can be construed as to deprive them of that right.
  • Your 10th Amendment rights… “States Rights” is what this is pushed as but the last statement is “or, to the people.” How have we managed to let others use this as a way to remove federal power over us just to be replaced by State power? If your tyrant is local is he any less a tyrant?

Recently my Mother passed away and as I jumped through the governments hoops of giving up my rights to settle her affairs (Yeah, they got me).I couldn’t help but wonder how it got to this point.

Because people always give way to government. Why? Because they say they know what is best? What makes them the experts on what is best? “Because things are different now”? How are they different? “They have bigger weapons”? Why do “they” have bigger weapons? Who gave them the right to have bigger weapons? “Because you will go to jail”? Why will you go to jail? Why are juries so dumbed down? What gives the government the right to arrest you for exercising a right?

The capitulation will continue and they will never have to fear a revolution.

Advertisements

i wish i could

 

it is hard when you know what is wrong and need to show people but they choose not to listen. I wish so hard that for just one minute I could get them to see. a small voice on a vast globe denouncing the lie that the world is. the indoctrination is so strong that even those who do see refuse to see it all. feeling alone and trapped. no longer knowing what to do. no longer knowing what to say. a wee small voice fading…

is it enough to say, “I tried.”?

i have become a tear in the rain.


Something Wicked This Way Comes…..

Welcome to the reality we now live in. A reality of vague half-truths that are above the comprehension of the average man. Not because he doesn’t look but because he is unaware he needs to. A well-trained populace of people who dimly see beyond themselves.

 Mainly we should thank the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel .  His philosophy has been used by many. One example is John Davison Rockefeller.  Rockefeller never believed in competition and contrary to popular belief was a supporter of labor unions. It is simply a matter of supporting both sides in a conflict to keep the conflict alive and control the outcome to ones advantage. This is the driving force of Hegel’s dialectic.  It appears as both sides are in constant conflict but they are working for the same goal.

In politics it is seen as the left-right paradigm. It appears as a communistic left in conflict with a capitalistic right. This is just an extension of what has come to be known as Rockefellerism.  The goal is global dominion.  The tactic is known as divide and conquer. It would never be wise to have the people have a common goal of freedom so they have to be trained to be at odds with each other. And if this doesn’t have the outcome you are seeking in one situation introduce another, and another til the people are so consumed with the battles they forget what they should have fought for in the first place.

Now introduce groups that will lead the people to their original goal and use these groups to more enslave the people in their useless fights. Introduce leaders that will save them from the lies but trick them into more lies. Push your propaganda on as many fronts as it takes while you sit back and watch the people fall for one ruse after another. And if a single voice is so bold as to say “WAIT!” beat it into submission so the masses will only follow who you want them to. Create frenzied masses to attack for a tin god you set up so as to destroy anyone who would bring forth the truth and show the people what they have fallen into in the name of patriotism. Create a paradigm where that one small voice will always stand alone and soon be forgotten.


Did Sheriff Matthews Traffic Enforcement Unit Put Kershaw County In The RED?

According to an article in  the Chronicle Independent out of Camden, SC on Monday, April 9,2012  it may have done just that. Herein lies the problem, it seems County Council Chairman Gene Wise is under the impression that if a deputy writes a ticket the courts are always suppose to see the deputies side. Wise is reported as saying he believes our courts should be “profit centers” for the county, not dispensers of justice.  Seems the courts do not agree. Well, now that requires an ad hoc committee and they have to call in everyone, the County Administrator, the chief magistrate, the Sheriff and the County Auditors to see why the judges are not playing nice.

Even Jimmy Jones has weighed in against the magistrates it appears. He states in the article he knows the activity is there and the deputies are writing three times as many tickets but the courts are “obviously doing something over there.” Maybe they are taking their cues from the Supreme Court, if it is wrong it is wrong. So like Obama they need to go forth and blame the courts.

So, how does this put the county in the red? Well it turns out the goose that layed the rotten egg, Sheriff Jim Matthews newly formed traffic enforcement unit, costs the county $350,000 to start up by purchasing the four new cars and the four new officers for the first year and Matthews told us it would pay for itself in the first six months but now  it has been 8 months and we are $130,000 behind. We are a long ways from being revenue expense neutral.   What does this mean? It means instead of going forth to serve and protect the deputies have to spend all their time writing tickets to cover their pay.  This means they are more likely than not harassing motorists who make the slightest of mistakes. Matthews has stated in the past that everyone stopped would at least get a warning, guess now they will all get tickets.

Vic Carpenter , the County Administrator, is reported as stating that the county would have to collect $30,000 a month going forward to become revenue neutral. He states the figures “haven’t come close to $30,000 a month.” But also states they have  been “picking up a little in the last two to three months.” according to the article. And I would suspect that after the printing of this article by the Chronicle they will be picking up even more. So if you have to drive through Matthews Cou, I mean Kershaw county please practice safe driving.


Federal Agencies; The Real Funding Behind Agenda 21

Livability means being able to take your kids to school, go to work, see a doctor, drop by the grocery or Post Office, go out to dinner and a movie, and play with your kids at the park – all without having to get in your car” – Ray LaHood.

This  statement appears on the front page of the US Department of Transportation’s DOT Livability website. The site further goes on to say,

U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has identified livability as a key priority for transportation. The Secretary’s vision is “transportation policies that focus on people and communities who use the transportation system.” A major way DOT helps communities pursue these aims is by issuing grants to eligible recipients for planning, vehicle purchases, facility construction, operations, and other purposes. DOT administers this financial assistance according to authorization, SAFETEA-LU [Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act], which was signed into law in August 2005. There are a large number of programs and grants within the Department of Transportation that support projects that enhance or relate to livability.”

Here we have the Federal Government providing the funding for Agenda 21 written into Federal law. A list of these programs can be found at the DOT Livability site.

The term “livability” is interchangeable with the term “sustainability”. This can be seen on the page titled “Livability 101” where we find the term “Partnership for Sustainable Communities”. This particular article goes on to point out

in June 2009, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Transportation, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency joined together to form the Partnership for Sustainable Communities, an unprecedented agreement to coordinate federal housing, transportation and environmental investments, protect public health and the environment, promote equitable development, and help address the challenges of climate change. The three agencies are working together more closely than ever before to meet President Obama’s challenge to coordinate federal policies, programs, and resources to help urban, suburban, and rural areas and regions build more sustainable communities and make those communities the leading style of development in the United States. The agencies are working together to identify opportunities to build more sustainable communities and to remove policy or other barriers that have kept Americans from doing so.”

Moving on we go to the DOT Federal Transit Administration website. Here we are introduced to Transit-Oriented Development where Public-Private partnerships can be found. (For some interesting reading check out the list of the council members of the National Council of Public-Private Partnerships.)A PPP is just another way for multinational corporations to get control of public held infrastructure. This is private held corporations getting their hands on your tax dollars. One way this works against the public is in these corporations being offered incentives to come into a community. These same incentives are rarely, if ever, offered to small independent businesses. The public is paying all the taxes and the multinationals are reaping the rewards.

We find more tax dollars going in grants at the Federal governments Sustainable Communities website where the DOT, EPA and HUD have formed a partnership. And even FEMA gets on board with the PPP agenda.

The US Dept. of Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation has the WaterSMART (Sustain and Manage America’s Resources for Tomorrow) program. In a pdf entitled “DOI WaterSMART Strategic Implementation Plan” we read,

Collaborative partnerships that go beyond political and institutional jurisdictions must be developed to ensure that the Nation’s limited water resources are used efficiently…

WaterSMART will work with states, tribes, local governments and non-governmental organizations…”

And there are grants to fund this as well as the rewilding projects with The US Fish and Wildlife Service. Releasing wild animals into areas with human populations like the Eastern Cougar whose site has a link to The Cougar Rewilding Foundation whose stated goal is to

Promote recovery of breeding populations of cougars through natural recolonization and mandated restorations to the central, southeastern and eastern United States…Promote full legal protection of all cougars living wild east of the Rockies, regardless of origin.”

and gray wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains. There is a blatant disregard for the lives of people or live stock with these programs.

A quick trip to the FEMA.gov website brings up a program called FEMA 365. This is tied into rebuilding after a natural disaster. Subtitled “Rebuilding for a More Sustainable Future” with “FEDERAL RESOURSES for technical assistance and FUNDING.” They have sustainable community workshops for disaster areas. The Disaster Mitigation Act of  2000 requires that states use FEMA funding to “…finalize interim requirements for the acquisition of property for open space with mitigation funds…”

And even ICLEI receives Federal funding as shown in an audit report from 2007 in which they received $1,774,346. ICLEI (Intrnational Council for Local Environmental Incentives) receives membership and consultation fees from local governments as well. It is an International entity and should not receive our Federal dollars.

Under the America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, H.R. 3200, even the CDC becomes involved with the Community Transformation Grants Program. “These awards are distributed among state and local government agencies, tribes and territories, and state and local non-profit organizations …” Another $103 million for Agenda 21.

The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) is the non-profit NGO that brings LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) program whose membership list includes a who’s who of Governmental agencies. Just go to Membership category and choose Federal Government and under Country choose USA.  There is also a list of Public policies adopting or referencing LEED.  In order to obtain LEED certification administrative fees have to be paid. The EPA’s LABs21 is based on the LEED system. It consists of public and private partners.

From Arne Duncan, the U.S. Secretary of education we get the following,

Reducing disease, developing renewable sources of energy, curbing pollution, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions are no longer challenges that stop at our borders. America simply cannot meet any of these challenges without collaborating with other countries. And those partnerships will require U.S. students to develop better critical thinking, a deeper understanding of science and sustainability, and a greater awareness of ecosystems and energy efficiency.”

And if you wish to help the U.N. Steal U.S. Property through Agenda 21 and the environmental scare the EPA has a grant for you. Want to become a citizen scientist? You can receive between $12,500 and $25,000. There’s the Environmental Justice Small Grants Program  with 100’s of projects and grants divided equally over the 10 U.S. Regions ranging from $10,000 to $25,000.

Of course the EPA is also interested in Wetlands, which by their definition could mean any land that ever gets wet. “Wetlands are areas where water covers the soil, or is present either at or near the surface of the soil all year or forvarying periods of time during the year, including during the growing season.” And there are grants for the wetlands too.  With the safe Drinking water Act we find that they are not only going to protect us from man-made contaminates but “naturally occurring” ones too. At a whim they could decide any natural occurring element is a contaminate and prohibit the use of any ground water anywhere. There is the 5 Star restoration program which

brings together students, conservation corps, other youth groups, citizen groups, corporations, landowners and government agencies to provide environmental education and training through projects that restore wetlands and streams. The program provides challenge grants, technical support and opportunities for information exchange to enable community-based restoration projects. Funding levels are modest, from $5,000 to $20,000, with $10,000 as the average amount awarded per project. However, when combined with the contributions of partners, projects that make a meaningful contribution to communities become possible. At the completion of Five Star projects, each partnership will have experience and a demonstrated record of accomplishment, and will be well-positioned to take on other projects. Aggregating over time and space, these grassroots efforts will make a significant contribution to our environmental landscape and to the understanding of the importance of healthy wetlands and streams in our communities.”

The department of Interior through the national Park Service has brought us the National heritage Corridors. Here in S.C. Alone the area covers 17 counties. The feasibility studies omit the catch phrases of Agenda 21 when proposed to the public but are used throughout other publications. Congress creates these heritage ares and the Park Service provides the funding. Again we have PPP’s with NGO’s and private corporations being involved.

There is a new bill, HR 4099, The National Heritage Act of 2012 being put before congress which states

Sec 2 (a) (3) Local initiatives based on community and regional visions, involving public/private partnerships, are critical to conserving, enhancing, and interpreting natural, historic, scenic, and cultural resources related to our American heritage. These initiatives should be encouraged and supported by the Federal Government with the concurrence of the relevant Federal land management agencies and tribal governments by providing financial and technical assistance.”

The first heritage area was signed into Law in 1984 by then President Ronald Reagan. This was the first of 49 NHAs.

One could spend days, if not years,  looking into all the programs, legislation and Executive orders that are in place to bring Agenda 21 about. I was told by my congressman and others that we need to stop this at the local level, which to a point is true, and that all they could do in Washington was defund it. The more I looked into it the more I found references in almost all, if not all, bills that pass through congress. It appears Washington has no intention of defunding it but appears they are working night and day to fund it and regulate us into it through all Federal agencies. Most of the local funding comes through Federal funding and PPPs. And even the most benign legislation can become the worst cancer on our rights.

Note. I had to update one of the links (National Council of Public-Private Partnerships.) because it seems when they know you have linked to them they move the offending pages. Please contact me or comment if any links do not work and I will do my best to fix them.


What Obama Didn’t Do.

The current President did not give us the United Nations. It was signed on to in June 26, 1945. According to UN History “The United Nations officially came into existence on 24 October 1945, when the Charter had been ratified by China, France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States and by a majority of other signatories” This came on the heels of Roosevelt’s meeting in Yalta with Stalin where they “…declared their resolve to establish ‘a general international organization to maintain peace and security’ “

August 8, 1945 Truman signed the UN Charter and after being the first country to complete the ratification process the U.S. also became the first country to join the new international organization.

Eisenhower followed with the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental relations (ACIR). The stated mission of ACIR, a permanent, independent, bipartisan intergovernmental agency established by Public Law 86-380 in 1959 was “To strengthen the American federal system and improve the ability of federal, state, and local governments to work together cooperatively, efficiently, and effectively.” There are 26 members on the commission consisting of six members of congress appointed by the house and senate leadership, four governors, three state legislators, four mayors, three county officials, three private citizens and three representatives of the federal executive branch appointed by the president.

ACIR’s functions are:

  • Convene federal, state, and local officials and private citizens to consider common problems;

  • Monitor events and conditions in the federal system;
  • Investigate the consequences of changes in the federal system;
  • Provide technical assistance to the executive and legislative branches of the federal government; and
  • Recommend changes in law, regulation, and practice to achieve a more desirable allocation of functions, responsibilities and revenues, and to improve relations among the levels of government.

This would put more power in the federal government through legislation with a stacked deck in any presidents favor.
John F. Kennedy signed Public Law 87-195 which established the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in 1961. In keeping with Agenda 21 we find stated on the site,

“In the 1990s, “sustainable development” was the priority, and USAID concentrated on programs that capitalized on the ability of a country to improve its own quality of life. During this decade, development assistance programs also were packaged according to a country’s economic condition: developing countries received an integrated package of assistance, while transitional countries received help in times of crisis. Countries with limited USAID presence received support through nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs.

This was followed by Public Law 87-297,  also known as The Arms Control and Disarmament Act. This calls for the elimination of our armed forces and weapons of all kinds. This act is used to reduce our military and increase the military functions of the U.N.

In October 1968, Lyndon Johnson gave us the Gun Control Act.

In March of 1969 President Nixon signed E.O. 11647 which divided the country into 10 regions. Although this was overturned by Reagan’s E.O. 12407 in February of 1983 the grant making agencies of the 10 regions remain in place. The Uniform Law Commission “…provides states with non-partisan, well conceived, and well drafted legislation that brings clarity and stability to critical areas of state statutory law.” Federal grants keep this alive and controlling the states by keeping the laws uniform.
Nixon also gave us Public law 92-500 a.k.a. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. This allowed the States to assume Federal pollution control enforcement on all businesses, land owners, their equipment and land by enacting enabling legislation approved by the federal government. It also created the Environmental Financing Authority with the power to acquire private property Real or personal) by whatever means.

In 1977 Jimmy Carter signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which was not ratified by the US until June 1992 under George W. Bush. In an article by Carter he writes,

President Bush officially took exception to some Covenant provisions that conflict with domestic laws, including one on juvenile executions. The Bush administration wants to reserve the right to allow states to continue to execute juveniles.”

Carter then gave us F.E.M.A. On July 20, 1997 with E.O. 12148. There is no Constitutional authority for Executive Orders and they have been instrumental in destroying our protected rights under the Constitution. Roosevelt alone issued 3,723.

Ronald Reagan, in keeping with the reduction of the US military ( Public Law 87-297), signed theIntermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) in 1987. The treaty eliminated nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with intermediate  ranges, defined as between 500-5,500 km (300-3,400 miles).

There was also the exposure of Rex 84 during the Iran-Contra hearings.

George Herbert Walker Bush, also in keeping with the reduction of the US military , signed the S.T.A.R.T.  Treaty on July 31,1991. This resulted in the removal of 80% of all strategic nuclear weapons. When the treaty expired in 2009 it was replaced in with a new treaty in April 2010 by Obama.
Bush continued with the pushing forward of NAFTA ,which finally came to fruition under Clinton, Public Law 101-216, updating Public Law 87-297, signed EO 12803– Infrastructure privatization, and pushed for Open Skies which would allow Russian planes access to US Airspace.

In Bushes letter to the Senate on August 12, 1992 he states,

“The Open Skies Treaty establishes a regime of unarmed aerial observation flights over the entire territory of its 25 signatories (North Atlantic Treaty Organization Allies, Eastern European members of the former Warsaw Pact, and Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Georgia). The Treaty is designed to enhance mutual understanding and confidence by giving all participants, regardless of size, a direct role in observing military or other activities of concern to them.”

In 1994 Bill Clinton signs PDD 25 outlining the administrations reforming multilateral peace operations requiring soldiers to wear UN blue helmets and insignia.  The actual document remains classified. Under Clinton the 104th Congress grants China “most favored nation” status.

In 1993 Clinton signs EO 12852 establishing the Presidents Council on Sustainability for the implementation of Agenda 21.

Clinton also signs EO 13122- Interagency task force on the economic development of the southwest border and creates Border Region XXI extending the border 150 miles north of Mexico.

November 12, 1998 Clinton signed the Kyoto Treaty -The Framework Convention on Climate Change. That gives the government another way to waste tax payers money, buying “Carbon Credits”.

Under George W. Bush we got Homeland Security, Public Law 107-296 November 25, 2002. He wasted no time signing Executive Orders placing several agencies under HS.

With the Continuity of Government plan this helped create  a dictatorship and broke Posse Comitatus. The Military and civilian forces are now coming together against the American people. This can also be seen in the Fusion Centers popping up around the country.

Bush gave us the Base Closure and Realignment Commission (B.R.A.C.). Remember Public law 87-297?

He also gave us Operation Falcon. These ideas sound good but are a blatant example of overstepping Constitutional authority.

And Bush gave us the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. (SPP) which is being implemented through the EPA and Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

This is just a small sampling of all the laws and regulations that have been enacted to bring us to this point. It is no wonder that Obama is doing what he is doing as it was allowed by his predecessors. People seem to think it is a good idea when their side has all this power but not so good when the other side does. Well, guess what? The other side always gets in office eventually. But remember, WE THE PEOPLE let this happen. Obama didn’t do this.WE did this.


Is the EPA Implementing Agenda 21 via the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America ?

Welcome to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.(SPP) According to the Congressional Research Service, in a pdf dated May 27, 2009, the SPP is a trilateral initiative that was launched in March 2005 to increase cooperation and information sharing for the purpose of increasing and enhancing security and prosperity in the United States, Canada and Mexico. It is not a signed agreement or treaty and has no legally binding commitments or obligations. This initiative was born in Waco, Texas when an agreement was reached by George W. Bush (U.S.), Paul Martin (Canada) and Vicente Fox (Mexico).

Created through the SPP was the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) which was made up of private sector representatives from North American Corporations. (Public/ Private partnerships)

According to Wikipedia the partnership was no longer continuing.

“In August 2009, the SPP website was updated to say: “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) is no longer an active initiative. There will not be any updates to this site. Subsequent to this the website link does not connect and the cache website links do not work.”

However, on February 4, 2011 Barak Obama and Stephen Harper announced a new partnership. Is Agenda 21 being implemented through this new partnership?

Well, according to the EPA’s own website I would say it is. In the article from the site “Commission for Environmental Cooperation Announces Funding to Address Environmental Problems in North Americawe find the following:

Eighteen projects were chosen from 500 proposals received last year as part of a new initiative announced at the CEC Council’s meeting held in Montreal. The successful projects span the eco-regions of North America and support environmental action at the community level from the sub-arctic tundra, to the grasslands of the Great Plains, to the tropical forests of Mexico. “

The CEC (North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation) was created in 1994. It’s stated goal is:

the CEC has advanced our understanding of trade-environment linkages; successfully promoted citizen engagement and increased government accountability regarding enforcement; achieved substantial results on key North American issues such as chemicals management and the conservation of North American biodiversity; and built substantial environmental capacities, particularly in Mexico, but also in the United States and Canada.”

We have the Joint Public Advisory Committee (JPAC) that consists of 15 members, 5 private citizens from each country, that advises the council. Their vision statement reads like an Agenda 21 handbook. And the member bios read like a who’s who of environmentalism.
This is a list of who received these grants from the
North American Partnership for Environmental Community Action.

One project,Carbon Market Links Between California and Mexico – La Sierra Cojolita Model REDD Project in Chiapas, states the following goals:

Goals:

 1. Develop reliable carbon credits to the world’s most rigorous forest carbon standard, the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS);

2. Reduce land use change by 15–30% by intensifying agricultural production and marking clear boundaries for reserve and embedded protected areas;

3. Strengthen local organizations and the engagement of local communities regarding land use practices and carbon credit exchange; and

4. Develop REDD learning networks for indigenous communities and local NGOs

You can go to NASCO’s website and see what is planned for North America under the SPP.

“Since 1994, North America’s Corridor Coalition members have been leaders at the forefront of uniting public and private…and environmental issues.”

The NAIPN, North American Inland Port Network, has determined six primary areas of focus:

1. Green practices in Inland Ports

2. Environmentally sustainable industrial growth

3. Trends in trade flows in North America

4. International trade strategies of Canada, U.S., and Mexico

5. Major transportation infrastructure projects in North America

6. Relevance of FTZ’s in today’s liberalized trade environment

And again the EPA becomes involved with the SmartWay program by funding competitive grants and providing low interest loans. It is all there, public private partnerships and sustainability.

“As an established public-private, market-based partnership, SmartWay has proven to be a good template for freight sustainability programs in other countries.”

“To help these and other countries address their concerns about energy security, economic vitality and climate change, SmartWay works with international stakeholders to help countries design, build and implement their own freight sustainability programs.”

It doesn’t matter if it was Bush or Obama we still have this North American Union (NAU) being implemented through regulations and NGOs thereby bypassing most congressional oversight. Why are our congressional members allowing this to happen? Why are WE letting them? And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

 


%d bloggers like this: