Tag Archives: deception

Lee Bright…The Next Closet Progressive?

I guess the best replacement for Lindsey Graham should be a guy who wants more government intrusion in your life. A quick look at his site is all it takes to see how much he supports bigger government intrusion into the lives of Americans.

Reading from his site “There are many alternatives that have proven to be successful such as charter schools, real school choice that supports private schools and home-schooling as well as programs where private and public schools work together.
South Carolina needs to attract the type of businesses that will strengthen the state’s economy and in turn improve communities.  This type of economic goal requires nothing short of a school system that produces a competitive workforce.”

Translation, Bright is for government control of private and home schooling as well as public schools. He has tried to introduce legislation (S 0279) to promote tax credits for private schools. Sounds good until you realize a tax credit is the same as receiving money from the government which the Supreme Court has said gives the government control. This would open the door for Common Core in ALL education.

But what is more interesting was his attempt to make the office of State Superintendent of Education an appointed office and remove the people’s right to elect same. That seems to be another goal of Senator Bright, to make several elected offices appointed positions, mainly judges. He has introduced bills, S 0197 & S 0200, that takes the choice of Administrative Law court judges, Supreme Court justices, Appeals court judges and Circuit Court judges out of the hands of the people and make them appointed offices. How better to remove power from the people.

In his bio Bright is listed as a member of the Board of Director for Palmetto Family Council, an offshoot of James Dobson’s Focus on the Family, a front group for Federal take over of private education. In an article “Behind The Conservative Curtain” (See link below) we read,

Charter Schools:  Same Old Goals 2000

Charter Schools, and Choice (vouchers & tuition tax credits) have been  incorporated into the GOALS 2000 legislation:

 

Public Law 103-227GOALS  2000: Educate America Act [1994] SEC. 308 State Use of [GOALS 2000] Funding-(b)  Each state that receives an allotment under this title shall(2) use the  remainder of the assistance…to implement the State improvement plan, [for  activities] such as …(I) promoting… public charter schools and other  mechanisms for increasing choice among public schools…(J) supporting  activities [where] schools contract with private management organizations to  reform a school.

It is  important to note that the above sub-section (J) suggests a plan to move public  schools under “private management.”

In my article “South Carolina’s Fed Gun Grab Enabling Bill…S 115 “Constitutional Carry” Act.”  I have shown how Bright has tried to introduce legislation that would enable  Federal agents, as well as officers from other states, free range in SC. He has no problem with pro-gun legislation because he wants to enable the feds to take your guns.

Then there was S 0185 which would put everyone on the government dole. Known as the “Fair Tax” we are seeing Cloward/Piven  rear it’s ugly head. Forget the welfare rolls, let’s get everyone on board with the tax rolls.

Links for better understanding of what is being supported by Lee Bright:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh195.htm

Charter Schools, Character Education & the Eugenics Internationale
Behind the Conservative Curtain:
Pseudo Grassroots Organizations Front
for Corporate/Government Takeover

The Intelligent Student’s Guide to the New World Order
Update:

When I wrote this article I used a link on Bright’s website that
linked to the SC Legislation site to see what bills he sponsored. That link, http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sponsorsearch.php ,
has since disappeared. Does he have something to hide? I also discovered that
the Mace Group designed his
website. Curious.

Update:    I have recently discovered, according to his statement of economic interest with the SC State Ethics Commission, that Bright attended an ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) conference and received travel expenses from Mulikin Law Firm, the state corporate co-chair of ALEC in SC. For those unaware, ALEC is a non-profit where legislators and corporations come together to write model legislation for the legislators to come home and introduce. I also learned ALEC has model legislation in support of TTIP & TTP. Included in these treaties is the investor-to-state dispute settlement (ITSDS). This is where corporations in a state can call for arbitration if any laws are passed that they believe will cost them future revenue. This gets into the billions of dollars.

Well,  Bright has introduced S 82 (120th Congress)  which lowers the corporate tax base in an attempt to get companies to come to SC, economic developement if you will, which sounds great except for the looming ITSDS that ALEC is pushing. It also begs the question, where does the missing revenue for the state come from? What if no new business comes to town? Why not rid the homeowners of the burden of keeping up infrastructure that sits empty or puts the real strain on infrastructure if occupied? Will these companies or their new employees pay your property taxes if you can’t? Why not look out for all the people of the state, the job he is supposed to do, instead of a select few?  And who gets to pick up the tab if the state loses arbitration?

Sorry, but if it walks like a duck , quacks like a duck and takes money from Bank of America like a duck….

Bright-BOA


WHY IS CHRISTIANITY SO OPPOSED TO CHRIST ?

     Why is the Church so dead set on going against the word ? Mainly this is seen in the politics of the Church. And should the Church even be involved in this arena? I call to mind God’s warning in the book of I Samuel where Israel wanted a king over them like everyone else. The people had rejected the reign of God and wanted to be reigned over by a king so God sent a warning by Samuel to the people and told them what the king would do to them. But they still wanted their king. God also warned as the king would take all from them they would cry out to Him but he would not harken to their voice. This king today in America is government. It steals from the people and makes slaves of them but they continue to want this government over them placing their faith in man and not God.

      In Jeremiah 17 God goes on to say, “Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm…Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is.”

     There is a lot of controversy over Romans chapter 13 as to obeying Government. Some of the arguments I hear for not obeying make little to no sense. That is not to say you should bow down before the almighty Government, but let’s look at some of the arguments out there. And I will start with my favorite; public prayer.

     As the Government uses freedom of religion to prohibit public prayer the Church has taken it upon itself to fight for the right to have it as they think of this as an attack on Christianity. But is it? Let’s look at what Christ has said about it.

     ST. MATTHEW 6

           5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they     love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, they have their reward.

           6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

     It appears that Christ was against public prayer. These were His words ,”shalt not”. Praying in ones closet even makes it impossible to remove prayer from school. So I ask, where has the Government went against the word of God here? And is this not a case where the Government should be obeyed?

     There is also a call to have the Bible taught in school and, as I will point out, it is so hard to find a Church that teaches it as it should. If the pastors are unable, or unwilling, to teach what Christ says is there a chance that the schools will do a better job. How many parents in a country where we have freedom of religion would really want practicing Wiccans teaching their children the Bible? Or even someone of a different Christian sect that teaches a different Jesus? I would think the parents would want to teach it themselves or even just let the child read it for themselves. I am sure there are those who will say they need a teacher so let’s again go to the word.

     ST. JOHN 14

          26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach  you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

     1 JOHN 2

          27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

     While we are in 1 John  2 let’s look at another verse of interest. Verse 22, which states, “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the  Father and the son.” In light of this and the fact that the Church seems to be, or so it says, against antichrist would this not make the term Judo-Christianity a contradiction in terms? And what about the new Chrislam? Why do the people of God allow themselves to be so easily led into the lies of the Church? What do they have against Christ?

     Now we have the Government running around removing the 10 Commandments from public buildings and Christianity running around trying to put them back up. Why has the Church taken it upon itself to put us all back under the law? Why deny the Grace of God through the finished work of Christ?

     GALATIANS 3

          10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is everyone that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

          11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.

          12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

          13 Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree.

     GALATIANS 4

          28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.

          29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the spirit, even so it is now.

          30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.

          31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free

     GALATIANS 5

          1 STAND fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and not be entangled again with the yoke of bondage.

     EPHESIANS 2

          8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

          9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

     In Revelation 17 it speaks of this faux religious system that will spring up and chapter 18 warns to come out of her so as not to be partaker of her sins and receive of her plagues. As I see the Government go after the Churches I have to wonder if this is not the government fulfilling the will of God.


%d bloggers like this: