Narcissistic Abuse and Stalking? The Legacy of Larry B. Risvold.

I have been torn between leaving this post up and taking it down. I have decided to leave it up for several reasons. The main one being I was attacked and threatened by a woman who it appears thinks nothing of prostituting her marriage for a car and a cruise. She has repeatedly, if you believe what they both have said, enabled her husband to use women so she can get a payoff. Then she has the gaul to attack the women when she is as guilty as he is. She should look at the person who has lied to her and broke trust. If what he has said about her is true, and my encounters with her has shown me it may well be, then I see why he is looking for something better but that is no excuse for his predatory behavior.

I have also witnessed Mr. Risvold lie about people to push his agenda in politics just as he lied to me to push his agenda to use someone.  And I was told by him if I wasn’t there he would do this to someone else.

The sad part is both of them think this is acceptable behavior.

Also, Mr. Risvold has been sending friend requests to my female relatives on facebook. Guess he is looking for His next victim.

What I am about to write may cause me to be attacked or ridiculed but it was the mind games of one person that brought me to the verge of taking my life and if not for the concern of friends I would no longer be here today. And if this in any way helps to save another life then what I will go through is worth it.

Roughly three and a half years ago I became involved in an affair with a married man. I warned him going in about my depression and he didn’t even bother to understand what I was saying, mainly because he was willing to sacrifice my life for his own pleasure. As the affair progressed I fell in love and he was well aware of my feelings but proceeded to use that to his advantage. He would punish me by withholding his attention until I played nice as it were. He made sure the entire relationship revolved around what he wanted and this of course started to wear on my depression. I was down to 96 lb., from 120, when he finally deserted me after promising that would never happen. But that was just one of the many lies he told me.

In the beginning he was telling me they were talking about a divorce, that he no longer loved her and would leave her as soon as he got his disability from the military. He was turned down for his disability and that changed the way he treated me.  He refused to talk to me when I really needed him to and when I would tell him how sick I was getting from his coldness toward me he would tell me to just get over it. I repeatedly told him for a depressed person that wasn’t possible.  He never cared.

He told me his wife had cheated on him right after they were married and he wasn’t even sure his son was going to be his. He said she had other affairs over the years. I can only wonder now if she ever cheated on him at all or he was just playing for sympathy.

Over the years he would say things to make me feel he did love me and then he would turn around and pull the rug out from under me by saying cold and hurtful things. And yes, he did tell me he loved me. I now know what he meant was he loved the way I made him feel.  And any time I raised concerns he would assure me I meant something to him. That he wasn’t going anywhere. Lies on top of lies on top of lies. He would promise things and never follow through in what only now appears as trying to keep me down and submissive.

He said he would leave her but she would get his money and even said to me one time he would kill her if she did get it. He told me he loathed her with such venom in his voice it scared me at the moment. He repeatedly told me and his friends how he wanted to just get away from her.

thna25tv3xWhen I would be hurt and crying he would laugh at me and tell me to grow a thick skin. He would push for sex even when I was crying. He pushed for sex even when I was in a weakened state. It was all about him and satisfying him. He never cared about me or what became of me. I honestly think he did want me to die. That would have solved his problem.

During the last political campaign he even was so cold as to attack a candidate over his “alleged” infidelity. When I asked him to stop as he too was having an affair he said it was ok because he wasn’t running for office. The affair we had was on going  when he ran for office and when I mentioned it he simply said we didn’t get caught.  I was hurt he had did this but he didn’t care. His attacks got worse against this candidate. (I have since discovered the candidate DID NOT have an affair but Mr. Risvold’s actions hurt his family.)

He is a retired Marine who talks about honor but has no honor. It meant nothing to him to hurt someone who could least afford it. If I had taken my life he would never had cared. He never checked to see if I was ok. I think he had hoped I would take my life.

Thank you Larry B. Risvold for ruining my life and destroying a loving heart just because you could, and for what?  SEX. Thank you for raping my soul.

If you are married and are thinking about an affair please reconsider it because a moments pleasure isn’t worth the life of another.

Update: I believe Mr. Risvold has been riding by my house in an attempt to intimidate me. I have no proof but it sounds like his dog that has a distinctive voice.  I have witnessed him beat his dog in the past Just for barking. And he has left bruises on my arms showing no concern .  I do not know what he is capable of. At the time I thought he was unaware of what he was doing but in light of remarks he has made and what appears to be an attempt to harass me has me worried. Mr. Risvold lives a life of illusion and any thing that threatens his appearance to those around him becomes a threat to him.

Bruises Mr. Risvold left on my arm.

Bruises Mr. Risvold left on my arms. Bruises Mr. Risvold left on my arm.




You tell yourself over and over exactly what you want to say hoping it all comes out clear but I can never express enough or in adequate words what hell I live through everyday with the depression. And when someone comes along and plays on the weakness of my disability I have to wonder what kind of person would do that knowingly. I don’t know if Mr. Risvold returned to my world just to get me to remove this article or if his feelings even border on sincerity. For starters, he basically used the excuse of his son finding this article to contact me, never even bothering to read the article. He finally did read it and told me I needed to remove it as I was only hurting myself. Mr. Risvold overlooks the fact that I don’t give heed to what others think of me. If they want to look down on me they will always find an excuse. People who know me know how I am but those who know Mr. Risvold only know a façade. He did later admit he thought it hurt him. Seems the only ones talking negatively about it to him was his family.

Yes, even knowing the article was out there he wanted to resume our relationship. He said he had regretted pushing me away. That he thought about me all the time. Just more lies on top of more lies? I hardly know any more. Publicly he has to pretend she is the important one because of the kids and privately I am the one that is important. What kind of reasoning is that? The “kids” are adults. But mainly it is the money. I guess it takes a lot of money to live a lie so your friends and neighbors never know the truth. That there is no real love or substance in your home. Even his wife admits she doesn’t love him and only stays for the money.

4eb9f332f67d3080f93bf873f362b5efI often wonder how Mr. Risvold says, “Simper Fi” with a straight face. The goddess he honors, Fides, is also the goddess of honesty and trustworthiness, Mr. Risvold seems foreign to both concepts. Maybe trusting him to be honest was a fool’s errand.  Mr. Risvold would say “Simper Fi” means faithful to God but this is the same guy who held his middle finger toward God in my living room because the weather was going to be too bad to go boating. Not very faithful to God at all.

He kept telling me I was the one he wanted to hurt the least but his actions were to hurt me the most. I think he did things purposefully in order to make me cry just so he could watch me in pain, like it made him proud of himself.  He did take advantage of my feelings for him and it has cost me a lot. I am sure it will cost him nothing. A few slaps on the back and a few “Atta boys” and he will be so proud of his accomplishment of ruining another’s  life. But he can never be proud of being an honest man. I am sure he will be told “the whore deserved it” and he will just laugh in a drunken stupor as he downs another beer.  My emotional state has left me sick and all I can hear is Mr. Risvold saying, “Get over it.” He always thought the depression was something to laugh at and take advantage of. Just a means to an end. But then what should one expect of a man who put on a Marine uniform and trolled a church to pick up women? He brings shame to the uniform and only hides behind it because it lets him pretend he is the man he will never be.

Update: It seems Mr. Risvold doesn’t know what “over” is. He has tried sending a friend over to use me like he did. I don’t know if it is because I cut him off entirely and that made him mad or if he just feels a need to keep hurting me. He has ridden by my house when I have repeatedly asked him in the past not to. There is no reason for him to unless he is trying to hurt or harass me. He has sent me an email threatening to sue me but backed off when I reminded him what would come out in court. If he saw this post as an issue why not sue when I first posted it instead of using it as an excuse to pick up where he left off? At this point I don’t think he would be stupid enough to hurt me but I am finding out I never really knew him. He has told me I haven’t seen him when he is really mad. And anyone capable of the damage he has already caused and thought so light of is capable of anything.  My God, he told a friend he needed to “get some of that” because “she needs it”. No Mr. Risvold, she needed someone to love her, not use her. You just needed someone to use.
You wanted everything to be all about you. Well I made it all about you.

Note: No apology for enabling him to do this the whole marriage. She is just as guilty for allowing the bad behavior. But I guess for some women selling their integrity for a new car every time their husband cheats is worth encouraging the bad behavior. And yes, he told me he loved me too.

A little touch on irony…Mr. Risvold once told me when he was overseas he used the women that the sailors were keeping up because he wasn’t going to pay for sex. If what he told me was true he is now keeping up a woman who other men are using for sex without paying for it.

Everyone told me Mr. Risvold was a liar, a user and, to put it politely, a coward. I chose to give him the benefit of the doubt. It was a mistake and I apologize to everyone for not listening. Mr. Risvold has no problem with others living with the damage he has caused but takes issue with being exposed for causing it. To Mr. Risvold I will say “I am sorry you were never the man I thought you were. I am sorry you have no self-respect but that does not give you the right to disrespect others. I am sorry you never felt I deserved the truth. But mostly I am sorry I trusted a guy who felt it was ok to send another guy to my house to get sex based on lies.”

A friend told me that your perception is your reality.

Mr. Risvold once told me that she could ruin him financially an I could ruin him emotionally. If this is true, then his attempts to hurt me after the break-up were because of emotions he never fully understood. The following is an excerpt from a recent conversation. He told a mutual friend that his reason for not leaving was because of my actions. By obligations he means she will get his money (The Risvolds have shown me with stunning clarity how the love of money is the root of all evil.). He did admit to me he had allowed certain things to happen but as usual Mr. Risvold chose to blame his actions on others. He shies away from taking any blame for what he has done. He also changes his story with his audience. I could say more but for now I will let the audio below speak for itself



In an attempt to get Mr. Risvold to stop stalking and harassing me I sent him a text. His wife replied with the following. I was not looking for attention but as I have avoided being anywhere I know he may be I have asked him to afford me the same and stay away. He doesn’t seem to be able to. The irony is her accusing me of texting him for attention. I would think it would be a better method, if that had been the case, than her, according to him, method of sleeping with any random guy she can pick up at a bar. I guess when you have no self-respect it’s hard to respect the boundaries of others.  And she thinks he tells her everything. That’s  priceless.
Her last comment was they are going to block my number. That is great if it will keep her husband from riding by my house. He is the one who can’t seem to let go. I wonder if he told her he still had plans to come over after I told her about us.
I wonder if he told her how many places inside the house we “made love”. How many times on the boat we “Made love”. How many motels he took me to. How he thinks her mother is a bigger “B” than her.  How people are saying they only took her mother in to get her money and they have a rather crude reputation at the VFW. (This last from someone who doesn’t even know them but hears the talk.). And that if I left he would just find someone else because she is a “chore” and no fun to have sex with.  That he tells people she has to watch porn to have sex. Oh, and I wonder if he told her he told a friend he was going to leave her for me. Yeah, I doubt he tells her everything. BTW, I was told the two are trying to play a game of CYA because neither can handle people knowing the truth about them.


In an attempt to put all this behind me, and thinking Mr. Risvold had decided to leave me in peace after I informed his wife he is still riding by my house, I had removed this post. Well, I guess fearing I would get a restraining order against him he has now put his wife up to doing his dirty work. I have noticed every time I remove the post the Risvolds do something to harass me. I have notice activity on my blog after taking the post down like someone was doing a search that kept landing them on my homepage. I think it is their intent to keep the post up. At this point I do fear for my safety as I have no idea what these two are capable of and also feel a need to keep this post up to document the ongoing harassment in case something does happen to me. I was warned by an advocate for abused women that the wife may get in on the harassment. After laying a little groundwork I will post her latest text to me below.

Some time back I got a friend to ride to Wal-Mart with me. As we were walking through the rear of the store I was looking down at my phone and noticed someone walking by. I looked up and it was the wife about to break her neck looking at me. When she finally caught my attention she looked immediately away. I just kept walking on and when away from her I told my friend who she was. He had been watching her and said he wondered what her problem was. He said she looked crazed.
Later as we were leaving the store I checked the checkout counters to make sure she was nowhere around so I would not run into her. As I was paying I looked up and noticed she was at the next checkout over. I proceeded to ignore her but my friend noticed she was staring intently at me and said he couldn’t see how she was able to get the groceries out of her cart as she couldn’t stop staring. I told him to ignore her and we left.
As I was driving home on a four lane road. I noticed she was behind me in the opposite lane and appeared to be trying to catch up. My friend said he needed to stop at a store for cigarettes so I changed lanes. At this time she move over in the opposite lane. I made a turn and if her intent was to harass it was halted by traffic.

Jump to the present. As I said I had removed this post after no harassment since July. Then out of the blue I receive the following text. If I feel I am being harassed under state law I have to inform them to stop and if they continue it is harassment.

Now, I realized from the start this was going to be another Risvold game of harassment and informed her I wanted none of it. There was no reason for her to contact me and I had been told they were blocking me. In fact she had called prior to the text and as I thought they would leave me alone I didn’t bother to block them or label her number. As soon as I became aware of who she was I hung up. But her first words to me were “I know you are recording this” so she was in no way worried about that. I have to record my calls because of a call from her in the past talking filthy to me. She had informed me on that call I didn’t record that she didn’t love her husband and got paid off when he got caught. The last time it was a car. I guess a cruise and renewed vows, from someone who didn’t care about them the first time, is a bigger pay day. Must be sad to be able to be bought off. He wanted to buy me stuff but I wouldn’t let him because I told him it felt like he was trying to buy me. The Risvolds don’t seem to understand you can’t buy love any more than you can buy integrity or class but God knows they seem to try.

She was not a “victim” as she appears to have no qualms about his infidelities as long as she got bought and even had no problem taking him back. He told me once when she was mad at him she told him if he wanted sex he would have to see me. He also told me it was nice to know there was someone out there who did love him and she only saw him as a paycheck. I ate one meal she cooked but she also ate food I took there. And her husband use to eat at my house while complaining that she never cooked for him. Her daughter did cut my hair once but I paid her, and a lot more than any hair cut is worth. And I only did that because her husband told me I should get her to cut my hair in front of the daughter. Was I suppose to hurt the daughters feelings because of dad? But dad was trying to score me a free haircut. That I would not accept. But where was her concern for her daughter when, according to the husband, the daughter was forced to move out so married what he was telling me was an emotionally abusive husband who she later divorced. He told me the wife was emotionally abusive toward the daughter. The daughter even stood in their garage and told me her mother was always saying the husband was the issue but that turned out not to be true. Mom was the issue. The husband also told me he thought the daughter knew about us and approved. She did catch us together one night. He told me he told her the next day she needed to find her own place.

I called her at work only to tell her to keep her husband home and away from me because I did not have her cell number and wasn’t risking him intercepting a call at home AFTER he told me to call her. Yeah, he did. Twice. But he was drunk on the lake at the time. I had just caught him in yet another lie. He said we were over and he didn’t love me but he would be over to see me the following Tuesday. I was going to make sure he never showed. Later I asked if that was the truth or if he was just mad. He said he was just mad. So if I had not told her guess where he would be now.

She wasn’t lying when she told me he had been cheating because he admitted to me he had. He said the kids knew about his cheating but were unaware of hers. And nothing I have posted is against the law. Mr. Risvold set the bar when he attacked a political candidate for having an affair that never took place. I repeatedly asked him to stop as he had no proof but he refused. He also attacked his own son on facebook. It seems to be OK when he wants to attack people but he can’t stand the finger being turned back on him.And every time before Mr. Risvold touched me I told him not to touch me unless he loved me and wanted a future with me. He understood that fully well. He even told a friend he had planned to leave her for me.

And No, I wasn’t trying to hurt them but trying to keep him from continuing to hurt me. I told him if I found out he was lying to me I was slamming that door so hard he would be afraid to knock again.

Like I said, his story changes with his audience. And NO, they were not thinking of me or she would have left me alone. He would have told her to. As to why they feel a need to keep things going is beyond me but I figure either she is afraid he does have feelings for me and wants me mad at him,  if she was confident in her relationship she would have left me alone, or they needed the post up to sue. Money means that much to them it seems. There is the possibility that they were trying to push me over the edge as both know I suffer from depression and suicidal ideations.

I don’t think Mr. Risvold would want me in a court room for the same reason she probably does. He has threatened me with law suits before. When I have said I would love to have the truth come out he backed off pretty fast.

I also sent him a text to tell her to stop. So they were both informed. I have blocked both to prevent further harassment.  Again, this latest started immediately after I had removed the post. I have found they leave me alone when it is up. So for my safety and hopes of keeping the harassment from escalating I am leaving it up. I was told to document every thing and this will show everyone what I am up against.

I just find it sad he now has to use her to do his dirty work. No matter how much I try to stay out of their lives they are the ones who feel a need to drag me back in. The mind games with these two are astounding.

The entire time we were together he never once told me he loved her. He even told me he only got married because he wanted to be married at the time. He told me he had told her he didn’t love me and when I asked him which one of us he lied to he said her. I had asked him once if he loved her and he said he loathed her and would kill her if she got his money. When I pointed out he had never told me he loved her all he said was, “Isn’t that interesting.” The sad part is neither will ever truly be able to trust the other’s love. He once told me a local lawyer told him the wife didn’t love him just by watching them interact.

Mr. Risvold has shown me his jealous side and he hoped to destroy me but he didn’t see the support I received from friends who have helped me to realize I deserve someone better than him and one day I may find someone decent and caring to share my life with. Mr. Risvold seems to fear that will happen and seems to want me to stay down. It is sad if they are so miserable in their pretend lives they want everyone else to share in their misery. A friend told me it must be miserable for him to be stuck pretending he cares for someone he obviously doesn’t. (He lost me and doesn’t want to lose his money too.) And if you listened to his audio above you can hear how easy it is for him to feign sincerity. Just ask yourself, “Is this the normal actions of happy people, to continue to harass someone who has stayed out of their lives?”.

What she fails to understand is that I sent him away by telling her. Now she will have to wonder if he is thinking of me when he touches her. His words to me after I told her, ”  I still think about a simple hug from you, your kiss, and just having my arm around you.  Yes we were magical in other areas, off the charts if I may but hurting you was never what I wanted to do.  You will always be in my heart. Like I said you are a wonderful woman who I will never forget.” She will have to wonder if he loves her or just the money. Like he said, “If you can’t be with the one you love then love the one you’re with.” He said his theme song with me was I fooled around and fell in Love.

I should also point out Mr. Risvold had told me if he did not have access to me he would do this to someone else. I lived with the guilt of remaining silent about a rape for almost 30 years and don’t want to live with the guilt of him doing this to others.

But this all could have been avoided if mr. Risvold, in an attempt to hurt me, had not put her on his phone to talk ugly to me and had not sent another man to my house hoping he could get sex, if mr. Risvold had ceased his riding by my house the times I asked him to stop and he had just come clean with me about what he had done, how he had lied to me and apologized for having done so. She actually had my sympathy for having to live with this guy up until the point that she took his phone and talked ugly to me. At that point she lost all sympathy. And this last attempt to hurt me while pretending to be nice shows me that maybe he wasn’t lying about how ugly she was at all. The funny part is her saying that she lied about her husband because she was mad at him. No matter how mad I got at him I never lied about him. He had told me that she told him when she was mad at him before that she was going to become my best friend and pick me for information on him to use in a divorce and maybe that was her intent. If so I’m pretty sure she was upset it did not go her way. One friend pointed out that there’s the possibility that she thinks he’s cheating again and this was the test to see if it was with me. But most people I spoke to believe that she’s mad at him and taking it out on me. If she’s mad at him she needs to take it out on him. It is also been pointed out to me that there’s a high probability he is over there now lying to her about me. But the most telling thing to me is that she went from attacking me on his phone to attacking me on her phone. But there’s no surprise to me that two people who lie to and about each other, if they do as they appear to, would make a happy couple. And I might would believe it if they both had not told me they only stayed for the money.

Hell, maybe Mr. Risvold just can’t handle a “real” woman.  (His words)


From yesterday morning. At least I know call blocker works.


Mr. Risvolds tactics appear to mirror those discussed in the article below.

After thoughts…

“If a man is deceitful with those he claims an affinity  for how much more so will he be to strangers.”

“Rape by deception is a crime in which the perpetrator has the victim’s sexual consent and compliance, but gains it through deception or fraudulent statements or actions.”




ROMANS 13: Yes, Government IS Ordained of God, but…..

This is a work in progress.

Romans 13…
I do believe all governments are ordained of God, but that does not mean it will be good. But God’s children (Those who are saved by Grace) do not have to fear it. But you do need to ask yourself what has the US done that God thinks we deserve the government we have? If rights are bestowed upon us by God then only God can take them away so why is He taking them away? And if you are one of His then you know how this ends, all politics aside. NO MAN in the oval office or any below can alter that. But why?

Before I start I want to tell a brief story. I had to go to court and was guilty of breaking man’s law and was still found not guilty. I won’t go into the particulars but God showed me two things, the law I broke hurt no one but me, if it hurt even me, and not to fear the lies that the officers told. You see, I never set out to hurt anyone and I didn’t hurt anyone. God knew the intent of my heart. He was also aware that these officers were lying against me to make it look like I was some terror out there that needs to be stopped. Another thing I noticed in preparing for court. Up until the last couple months before court I looked diligently at the evidence and knew the case inside out. But the last few months I lost interest in preparing and just decided I would play it by ear in court. I had no clue what I was going to say. I will add a link to the audio of my day in court below but I also had resisting arrest charges against me and God gave me the foresight to video tape the encounter which proved the officer lied.  And to this day I don’t believe a single officer viewed the video or even understood what they were seeing. We were even denied evidence.


Romans 13(KJV)

Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil…

There are generally two trains of thought here; 1) Because the government is led by ungodly men we are under no obligation to follow it. We must remove ourselves from all evil. And 2) Government is ordained of God and we must follow it to the letter. Both seem a bit off base when taken into context of the Bible.

Looking at what Christ says in Matthew 22 it is in keeping with verse 6 of Romans 13.

16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men.17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?21 They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.

And yet again there are usually two trains of thought; 1) We owe and must pay taxes. And 2) We are under God, not Caesar, and owe no tax. Again, both appear to be wrong.

When approached about the tribute Christ was basically asking who owned the money. Then He proceeded to tell them if it was Caesar’s money Caesar had a right to ask for it back. When someone lends you something, like the Federal Reserve, the loaned object is still property of the lender. They can ask for it back.

If government is, and I believe it is, ordained of God then where the problem lies is in that God will give you the government you deserve and not the one you want. “But America is a Christian country.” Is she?

In the book of 1 Samuel, chapter 8, God warns the Hebrew Children what will happen if they reject Him and set up a King over themselves and He did not paint a pretty picture. He told Samuel He would give them a King but the King would take from them and give to who he chose. Sound like Washington today? Man has never learned to turn from governance back to God.

And the worship of states and statesmen was born. I get to see this in high gear every time an election comes around. God’s warnings are never heeded.

Jeremiah 17
Thus saith the Lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.For he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh; but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, in a salt land and not inhabited.Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is.For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out her roots by the river, and shall not see when heat cometh, but her leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit.The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?10 I the Lord search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings.


I have seen people do some evil things to get “Their” guy elected. I have seen people I thought I could respect lie for and about candidates. I have seen candidates promises people things they never plan to deliver and the people eat them up and praise them like they are Gods. Idolatry. The lesser of two evils is still evil.

Luke 22
24 And there was also a strife among them, which of them should be accounted the greatest.25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.26 But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.

So, here is Christ saying not to be in a position of authority. Which begs the question, “Can someone be a follower of Christ and be a politician?”. How could they be a “doer” of the Word? Christians should not, nor be encouraged to, look to government when they should be looking to God. Government has become the US’s idol of worship. It will not, nor can it save you.

2 Thessalonians 2:10-13

And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. …

John 4:23-24

But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.



Death to America; A Biblical Theocracy?

It may come as a shock to most “Christian” Americans but the US Constitution is a secular document and not meant to be a ringing endorsement of Christianity. In fact, it prohibits the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob from having any say at all in government.  The first Amendment is the culprit. Yes, it does give you the right to worship God as you see fit, but it also prohibits you from pushing your will on anyone else. And what I see running rampant through politics these days calling itself “Christianity” makes me thank God for that.

I am a Christian and the thought that this faux Christianity could in fact push its way into politics and create a Biblical Theocracy based on a skewed belief system is something every Christian should be concerned about. The Beast of Revelations could be manifesting right before our eyes.

When I see the conservative movement trying to push through legislation based on “religious” beliefs I have to wonder if they know the difference between a Representative Republic and a Theocracy? And whose idea of “Christianity” do they think will end up reigning over them?




“When someone takes your love without giving in return it kills something in your soul as well as theirs.” anon



“It is usually too late for him when a man discovers materialism and alcohol will never be competitors for a warm and loving heart.” anon



“Nevermore” The Raven

“I once took love for granted and it went away. I have never regretted anything more because I never knew that love again. What I had feared another taking I alone had given away” Rikki



Check back for updates…..




Agenda 21 and the environmental movement.

Most of the people in the truth, patriot and freedom movements are well aware of the UNs Agenda 21 , their agenda for the 21st century. Most see it as a wacko environmentalist agenda to steal land and set it aside for the happy little creatures giving them presidence over human life. Well, the agenda is real but has little to do so much with happy little creatures as multinational corporations wanting to take over your land and controlling your use of it. To keep the environmentalists on board they wrap it in these wonderful phrases like “Sustainable development”. They speak of these wonderful green spaces and sustainable energy. Small enclaves of people in sustainable cities surrounded by vast open wilderness where they are rewilding to protect the happy little creatures. They use Federal agencies like the EPA, The Department of the Interior and of course that truly nasty BLM. And most agree this must be stopped. But how and by who?


Enter the anti-government overreach crowd. Sounds good but is it?

“Too much government over reach”, is the hue and cry of the crowd. While this is a true statement and I am as much against the over reach of government as any one I have to look at the route this movement is now taking everyone in. The latest is this push to take back Federal lands and turn it over to the states. There is even legislation out there being pushed to do exactly that. But who is behind it? And why? What is the result they are aiming for?


Model States legislation and ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council)

For those who are unaware ALEC is Legislators, Corporations and other non-governmental organizations who come together to write what they call model states legislation. Legislation tailored to your state. They make these bills sound like a conservative’s dream come true. But take a good look at their members?.
If you have ever been to your state’s Capital when congress is in session you have seen the sea of lobbyists you have to wade through to talk to your congressional representatives. And for the most part these lobbyists are not there on the people’s behalf. ALEC is in a sense these lobbyists writing laws to benefit corporations and other NGOs with your state representatives right there in the mix. The legislators then bring these laws home and with the help of ALEC get them passed.
Not only are the states pushing for this land transfer but also some in the federal government as well. In a  memo entitled “Views and Estimates for Fiscal Year 2016” from the chair of the Committee on Natural Resources , Bob Bishop (R-UT),  sent to the House Budget Committee Rep. Bishop states “The solution is to convey land without strings to state, local, and tribal governments.” . He also asks for  $50 million in taxpayer dollars to cover the transfers.  This all may sound good until you look at what will now become of these lands.
The populations of most western states is relatively small and the people of these states would either face a tax increase that most can’t afford or the states would have to sell off these lands to the highest bidder. Or, worst yet, the local governments will take Federal grants to offset the cost.
The cost of fire prevention and control alone would put a major burden on these state as pointed out in a pdf  by Wildfire suppression in these states cost US taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Ranchers would have to pay higher grazing fees in most of these states if they were even allowed to continue using the land. State agencies would be forced to grow to compensate for the federal agencies that were vacating.
States could also follow the Economic Development route and Industrial Parks could pop up everywhere. And guess who gets to pay for those? Taxpayers. The idea of making the area attractive to potential industries. These parks can sit idle for years. Or the state promises the industries it will provide training of the local population for their needs and offer all types of tax incentives. And once the incentives run out so do the industries.
If forced to sell the land the most likely buyers would be those who can afford vast amounts of acreage, namely multi-nationals and UN based environmental groups like the WWF. The same people who want to use Agenda 21 to take the property in the first place.
If the local counties are told they must keep up the property in their areas, well the best funding is usually Federal grants, generally brought to you by your local COG, with many strings attached. The land has greater Federal restrictions, usually involving some public/private partnership due to the fact these federal grants usually stipulate the fed will cover only part of the cost and the state must supply the rest. The only other option would again be higher taxes. Then there are the “buffer zones”, privately owned land next to the public land where land use is restricted because of its effect on the public land it abuts, thereby reducing the value of the private land but not the property taxes. Again you have Agenda 21 in play. I have covered some of these grants in an earlier article.
Take a look at this article that appeared on the  website. Turning Federal lands over to states will bring in more regulations, not less. There are many of these horror stories all over the web.
And who benefits? Take another look at the private companies aligned with ALEC.



You have a right to Life, Liberty and whatever Lee Bright thinks is moral?

So much for the separation of powers in Lee Bright’s mind. He thinks Congress should be able to control two branches, both the legislative and the judiciary.

I don’t want to choose how other people live their lives and don’t want them pushing their choices on me. Lee Bright, however, wants to tell you how to live your life and feels he should be able to impeach any Supreme Court jurist who doesn’t agree with him. I never knew it was the role of The Supreme Court to decide the morality of a person’s lifestyle. I just thought it was their job to interpret law.

“Congress ought to stand up and do its job and impeach one of these federal judges. And I think when you do that, being a federal judge is a pretty good gig, and I think if you’ll impeach just one, the rest of them will do the right thing. And they’ll do it out of necessity, because self-preservation is an instinct that so many folks have.” Lee Bright at a TEA Party Express meeting in Utah.

Is Sen. Bright saying the Supreme Court needs to be the judge of morality? Whose morality? Even Christ forbade such a judgement. “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.” Matthew 7:1-2

So, where does all this legislating morality come from? According to his bio he was on the Board of Directors of Palmetto Family Council, an offshoot of James Dobson’s Focus on the Family. In Dobson’s book, Dare to discipline, “he places a needed emphasis on discipline by structure,” but he draws from a Skinnerian ideology; i.e., “according to Dobson, a child is to be ‘trained’ as one would train his dog …The presupposition (not stated, but underlying the book) is that man is but another animal,” Excerpted from The Big Umbrella by Jay Adams, pp. 130-131.

I guess this explains also why Bright is a fan of Common Core. School Choice is the back door for common core to infiltrate all education, including private and home schooling. According to Charlotte Iserbyte, “Communist Core is NOT the issue. Those fighting Communist Core better wake up and realize that even if they kill Communist Core, if they do NOT oppose ALL forms of tax-supported School Choice and Charter Schools, they will wake up one day and find that their children in their favorite tax-supported choice private school are required by federal law (regulations) to take the Communist Core assessment (test) they thought they had killed! Why? Because when an education entity (private or public) accepts one penny of federal money it MUST adhere to federal regulations regarding curriculum, testing, hiring, etc., etc. And that is as it should be.”

School Choice is part of Agenda 21. Which begs the question, “Why would Bright sponsor anti-Agenda 21 legislation when he is also sponsoring UN Agendas?” Is it there to keep you from noticing what he is really working for?

Noted by me in a previous article was his attempt to make the office of State Superintendent of Education an appointed office and remove the people’s right to elect same.  He has introduced bills, S 0197 & S 0200, that takes the choice of Administrative Law court judges, Supreme Court justices, Appeals court judges and Circuit Court judges out of the hands of the people and make them appointed offices. Looks like an attempt to remove anyone who doesn’t agree with Bright’s agenda or the agenda of his handlers.

I think it is a question that deserves an answer, Is he just that naïve or is he really working toward implementing Agenda 21 while at the same time decrying it?

Lee Bright…The Next Closet Progressive?

I guess the best replacement for Lindsey Graham should be a guy who wants more government intrusion in your life. A quick look at his site is all it takes to see how much he supports bigger government intrusion into the lives of Americans.

Reading from his site “There are many alternatives that have proven to be successful such as charter schools, real school choice that supports private schools and home-schooling as well as programs where private and public schools work together.
South Carolina needs to attract the type of businesses that will strengthen the state’s economy and in turn improve communities.  This type of economic goal requires nothing short of a school system that produces a competitive workforce.”

Translation, Bright is for government control of private and home schooling as well as public schools. He has tried to introduce legislation (S 0279) to promote tax credits for private schools. Sounds good until you realize a tax credit is the same as receiving money from the government which the Supreme Court has said gives the government control. This would open the door for Common Core in ALL education.

But what is more interesting was his attempt to make the office of State Superintendent of Education an appointed office and remove the people’s right to elect same. That seems to be another goal of Senator Bright, to make several elected offices appointed positions, mainly judges. He has introduced bills, S 0197 & S 0200, that takes the choice of Administrative Law court judges, Supreme Court justices, Appeals court judges and Circuit Court judges out of the hands of the people and make them appointed offices. How better to remove power from the people.

In his bio Bright is listed as a member of the Board of Director for Palmetto Family Council, an offshoot of James Dobson’s Focus on the Family, a front group for Federal take over of private education. In an article “Behind The Conservative Curtain” (See link below) we read,

Charter Schools:  Same Old Goals 2000

Charter Schools, and Choice (vouchers & tuition tax credits) have been  incorporated into the GOALS 2000 legislation:


Public Law 103-227GOALS  2000: Educate America Act [1994] SEC. 308 State Use of [GOALS 2000] Funding-(b)  Each state that receives an allotment under this title shall(2) use the  remainder of the assistance…to implement the State improvement plan, [for  activities] such as …(I) promoting… public charter schools and other  mechanisms for increasing choice among public schools…(J) supporting  activities [where] schools contract with private management organizations to  reform a school.

It is  important to note that the above sub-section (J) suggests a plan to move public  schools under “private management.”

In my article “South Carolina’s Fed Gun Grab Enabling Bill…S 115 “Constitutional Carry” Act.”  I have shown how Bright has tried to introduce legislation that would enable  Federal agents, as well as officers from other states, free range in SC. He has no problem with pro-gun legislation because he wants to enable the feds to take your guns.

Then there was S 0185 which would put everyone on the government dole. Known as the “Fair Tax” we are seeing Cloward/Piven  rear it’s ugly head. Forget the welfare rolls, let’s get everyone on board with the tax rolls.

Links for better understanding of what is being supported by Lee Bright:

Charter Schools, Character Education & the Eugenics Internationale
Behind the Conservative Curtain:
Pseudo Grassroots Organizations Front
for Corporate/Government Takeover

The Intelligent Student’s Guide to the New World Order

When I wrote this article I used a link on Bright’s website that
linked to the SC Legislation site to see what bills he sponsored. That link, ,
has since disappeared. Does he have something to hide? I also discovered that
the Mace Group designed his
website. Curious.

Update:    I have recently discovered, according to his statement of economic interest with the SC State Ethics Commission, that Bright attended an ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) conference and received travel expenses from Mulikin Law Firm, the state corporate co-chair of ALEC in SC. For those unaware, ALEC is a non-profit where legislators and corporations come together to write model legislation for the legislators to come home and introduce. I also learned ALEC has model legislation in support of TTIP & TTP. Included in these treaties is the investor-to-state dispute settlement (ITSDS). This is where corporations in a state can call for arbitration if any laws are passed that they believe will cost them future revenue. This gets into the billions of dollars.

Well,  Bright has introduced S 82 (120th Congress)  which lowers the corporate tax base in an attempt to get companies to come to SC, economic developement if you will, which sounds great except for the looming ITSDS that ALEC is pushing. It also begs the question, where does the missing revenue for the state come from? What if no new business comes to town? Why not rid the homeowners of the burden of keeping up infrastructure that sits empty or puts the real strain on infrastructure if occupied? Will these companies or their new employees pay your property taxes if you can’t? Why not look out for all the people of the state, the job he is supposed to do, instead of a select few?  And who gets to pick up the tab if the state loses arbitration?

Sorry, but if it walks like a duck , quacks like a duck and takes money from Bank of America like a duck….


%d bloggers like this: